(U.S. Fed. Cir., Civil Procedure, Consumer Products, Intellectual Property, Patent) In plaintiff’s patent infringement suit against Hyundai and other automakers related to a method for assisting a salesperson in selecting appropriate parts corresponding to a customer’s particularized need using a computerized system, district court’s ruling of no unenforceability for inequitable conduct and denial of defendant’s [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent infringement suit related to patents for cochlear implants, dismissal of the case for lack of standing to sue on the ground that plaintiff’s 2004 agreement with a third party granting an exclusive license to the patents at issue was a virtual assignment of the [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In plaintiff’s action seeking to cancel a trademark in International Class 32 on the ground of abandonment, the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denying a motion to leave amend pending the petition is reversed as the TTAB’s denial of the motion [...]