Archive for the 'DC COA' Category
In US v. Brown, No. 08-3018, the court of appeals affirmed defendant’s bank fraud conviction, on the grounds that 1) the extrinsic evidence of defendant’s other uses of fictitious financial documents was substantively and temporally tied to the charged offenses, and those other uses were distinct enough not to be the “needless presentation of cumulative [...]
March 8th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
The D.C. Circuit decided one case on a matter of administrative law, specifically pertaining to the FDA, and another concerning elections.
Unity08 v. FEC, No. 08-5526, involved an Administrative Procedure Act challenge to the Federal Elections Commission’s advisory opinion on the question of whether plaintiff would be required to register as a political committee before selecting [...]
March 3rd, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
The D.C. Circuit decided four petitions for review of agency decisions, one civil procedure matter, one criminal case and one ERISA matter.
Elliott v. US Dept. of Agric., No. 07-5385, was an action under the Freedom of Information Act to compel the U.S. Department of Agriculture to disclose blueprints to buildings located on an agricultural research [...]
March 1st, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
Bush v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7016, involved an action by six minority members of a police department claiming that defendant police supervisor’s racially discriminatory conduct and the district’s complicity impaired plaintiffs’ employment contract.
As the court of appeals wrote: “Plaintiffs are six minority members of the Metropolitan Police Department. They sued their supervisor, … and [...]
February 24th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
Gonzalez-Vera v. Townley, No. 09-5134, was an action seeking to invoke one of 18 U.S.C. section 3523’s enforcement procedures, the appointment of a guardian to help collect a judgment against an individual under the Witness Protection Program.
As the court of appeals wrote: “[Defendant] was linked to the July 1976 torture and murder of Carmelo Soria Espinoza [...]
February 24th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
Today, the D.C. Circuit decided an appeal in an action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and related statutes.
In Schuler v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, No. 08-7115, plaintiffs alleged that defendant accounting firm refused to make plaintiffs partners because of their ages, in violation of the ADEA and its District of Columbia and New [...]
February 17th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
Defendant’s drug and firearm possession convictions are affirmed where it was reasonable for the police to believe evidence relevant to defendant’s weapons-possession offense would be found inside his briefcase.
Read US v. Vinton, No. 07-3125
Appellate Information
Argued December 10, 2009
Decided February 5, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Brown
Counsel
For Appellant:
Beverly G. Dyer, A.J. Kramer and Neil H. Jaffee, Assistant Federal [...]
February 13th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
In a sex and age discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) defendant failed to carry its burden to show that plaintiff did not timely contact an EEO counselor and thus did not exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2) plaintiff did not fail to respond to defendant’s exhaustion argument.
Read Miller v. Hersman, [...]
February 13th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
In a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, a denial of petitioner’s habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) a “reverse sting” downward departure was inapplicable because petitioner was sentenced not based on drug quantity but rather as a career offender; and 2) petitioner failed to show a reasonable probability that the district court, [...]
February 13th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments
In a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, a denial of petitioner’s habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) a “reverse sting” downward departure was inapplicable because petitioner was sentenced not based on drug quantity but rather as a career offender; and 2) petitioner failed to show a reasonable probability that the district court, [...]
February 8th, 2010 | Posted in DC COA | No Comments