In California State Foster Parents’ Ass’n v. Wagner, No. 09-15025, an action against officials of the State of California under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claiming a violation of plaintiffs’ federal right to payments under the Child Welfare Act (CWA), and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, the court affirmed judgment for plaintiffs where the CWA, at [...]
In California State Foster Parents’ Ass’n v. Wagner, No. 09-15025, an action against officials of the State of California under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claiming a violation of plaintiffs’ federal right to payments under the Child Welfare Act (CWA), and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, the court affirmed judgment for plaintiffs where the CWA, at [...]
In California State Foster Parents’ Ass’n v. Wagner, No. 09-15025, an action against officials of the State of California under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claiming a violation of plaintiffs’ federal right to payments under the Child Welfare Act (CWA), and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, the court affirmed judgment for plaintiffs where the CWA, at [...]
Kamalyan v. Holder, No. 05-76408, involved a petition for review brought by an Armenian Jehova’s Witness challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order adopting and affirming a decision of an immigration judge removing petitioner from the U.S. The court granted the petition on the ground that any reasonable adjudicator would agree that the government did [...]
In California State Foster Parents’ Ass’n v. Wagner, No. 09-15025, an action against officials of the State of California under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claiming a violation of plaintiffs’ federal right to payments under the Child Welfare Act (CWA), and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, the court affirmed judgment for plaintiffs where the CWA, at [...]
Kamalyan v. Holder, No. 05-76408, involved a petition for review brought by an Armenian Jehova’s Witness challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order adopting and affirming a decision of an immigration judge removing petitioner from the U.S. The court granted the petition on the ground that any reasonable adjudicator would agree that the government did [...]
Kamalyan v. Holder, No. 05-76408, involved a petition for review brought by an Armenian Jehova’s Witness challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order adopting and affirming a decision of an immigration judge removing petitioner from the U.S. The court granted the petition on the ground that any reasonable adjudicator would agree that the government did [...]
In Singh v. Napolitano, No. 07-16988, the court affirmed the denial of petitioner’s habeas petition, holding that the Attorney General’s decision in Compean II, which affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s language in Lata and Dearinger, did not create “new duties” for petitioner with respect to his habeas petition.
In US v. Havelock, No. 08-10472, the court reversed defendant’s [...]
In Singh v. Napolitano, No. 07-16988, the court affirmed the denial of petitioner’s habeas petition, holding that the Attorney General’s decision in Compean II, which affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s language in Lata and Dearinger, did not create “new duties” for petitioner with respect to his habeas petition.
In US v. Havelock, No. 08-10472, the court reversed defendant’s [...]
In Singh v. Napolitano, No. 07-16988, the court affirmed the denial of petitioner’s habeas petition, holding that the Attorney General’s decision in Compean II, which affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s language in Lata and Dearinger, did not create “new duties” for petitioner with respect to his habeas petition.
In US v. Havelock, No. 08-10472, the court reversed defendant’s [...]