Archive for July, 2010

Felon in Possession Sentence Affirmed, and Criminal Matter

In US v. Ford, No. 09-2244, the court of appeals affirmed defendant’s sentence for being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, being a fugitive in possession of firearms and ammunition, and possession of stolen firearms, on the grounds that 1) the evidence of defendant’s prior Kansas escape was undoubtedly res gestae–intrinsic evidence inextricably [...]

Felon in Possession Sentence Affirmed, and Criminal Matter

In US v. Ford, No. 09-2244, the court of appeals affirmed defendant’s sentence for being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, being a fugitive in possession of firearms and ammunition, and possession of stolen firearms, on the grounds that 1) the evidence of defendant’s prior Kansas escape was undoubtedly res gestae–intrinsic evidence inextricably [...]

Reversal of Tax Refund, and Criminal Matter

In Sala v. US, No. 08-1333, an action seeking a tax refund, the court of appeals reversed the district court’s order granting the refund, holding that the transaction giving rise to petitioner’s claimed tax loss had no economic substance because the claimed loss generated by the program was structured from the outset to be a [...]

Reversal of Tax Refund, and Criminal Matter

In Sala v. US, No. 08-1333, an action seeking a tax refund, the court of appeals reversed the district court’s order granting the refund, holding that the transaction giving rise to petitioner’s claimed tax loss had no economic substance because the claimed loss generated by the program was structured from the outset to be a [...]

Colorado Certificate of Title Act Did Not Supersede Colorado UCC

In re: Roser, No. 09-1341, involved a creditor’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order holding that the trustee in a Chapter 7 proceeding could avoid a creditor’s lien.  The court of appeals reversed on the ground that the Colorado Certificate of Title Act (CCTA) did not supersede Colorado UCC section 4-9-317(e) because the provision did [...]

Colorado Certificate of Title Act Did Not Supersede Colorado UCC

In re: Roser, No. 09-1341, involved a creditor’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order holding that the trustee in a Chapter 7 proceeding could avoid a creditor’s lien.  The court of appeals reversed on the ground that the Colorado Certificate of Title Act (CCTA) did not supersede Colorado UCC section 4-9-317(e) because the provision did [...]

Decisions In Immigration Law & Suit Against Housing & Urban Development

Ly v. Holder, 09-2529, concerned a Cambodian citizen’s petition for review of a final order of the BIA upholding an IJ’s denial of his request for asylum and related relief.  In denying the petition, the court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA and IJ’s findings that petitioner’s fears of future harm were unrelated to a [...]

Decision in Criminal Matter, Plus Corporate Veil Piercing of Credit Counseling Org.

Zimmerman v. Puccio, 09-1416, concerned a challenge to the district court’s grant of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a class action lawsuit against defendant-Cambridge Credit Counseling Corporations (Cambridge) and other corporate defendants, pursuant to the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection [...]

Criminal Matter & Exclusion of Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Suit

US v. Maldonado, 09-1626, concerned a challenge to the district court’s imposition of a sentence of 120-months imprisonment in a prosecution of defendant for crimes related to his role in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine.  In vacating the sentence, the court held that an attaching plates offense under Massachusetts law does not count toward defendant’s [...]

Class Action Suit Against Puerto Rican Bar Association for Mandatory Life Insurance Purchase

Brown v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico, 08-2432, concerned a class action suit against the integrated bar association of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, arising from the organization’s activity of requiring members to purchase life insurance in order to practice before Puerto Rican courts.  As stated in the decision: “After Romero, Colegio did not [...]